Functional Movement Screen Normative Values and Validity in High School Athletes: Can the FMS be Used as a Predictor of Injury?
Posted by Kyle Barrow
It seems as if every lower extremity overuse ailment is associated to some degree with valgus collapse. ACL tears? Check. Patellofemoral Pain? Check. Illiotibial band pain? Check. Tibial Stress Fractures? Check. As a result, a number of research studies have begun to examine what exactly valgus collapse is and what factors are associated with valgus. One of the primary researchers in this area is John Willson, PT, PhD in the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of Wisconsin at LaCrosse. Research conducted by Dr. Willson has led us to a better understanding of this pathological movement.
First, it is important to understand what components of movement make up the valgus collapse construct. Valgus collapse is typically measured by viewing the frontal plane motion and thus creating a frontal plane projection angle. However, just because we see the picture shows frontal plane motion does that suggest the motion is coming from the frontal plane in the body. Even when you place the knee joint in 40 degrees of flexion (typical of running at midstance), the available frontal plane motion is minimal. As a result, we need to understand what are the primary motions associated with this pattern.
An initial study in this area by Willson and colleagues correlated the two-dimensional frontal plane projection angle to three-dimensional data of the lower extremity during a single leg squat in 40 runners half of whom had patellofemoral pain. The researchers observed that the strongest correlates of the frontal plane projection angle were the frontal plane motion at the hip and transverse plane motion at the knee (external rotation) and hip (internal rotation). Not surprisingly, there was not a significant relationship for the frontal plane angle at the knee. Additional analysis of the significant relationships revealed that the primary factors associated with the valgus collapse posture were contralateral pelvic drop, femoral adduction and femoral internal rotation. While I imagine this result does not surprise anyone it provides support and directions for areas with which to intervene when aiming to alter valgus collapse.
As a result of this study, we now have a better idea of what is associated with valgus collapse. Now the follow up question is what needs to change to reduce valgus collapse? Is it just a strength issue, is it a muscle activity issue, is it a proprioceptive issue? Well, in all likelihood it depends on the individual who needs the training and it is important to systematically screen out all of these issues. That being said through controlled research studies we can begin to understand what are the primary factors associated with this pattern. Examining the factors associated with valgus collapse will be highlighted in the 2nd part of this series before we begin to take a look at some motion analysis case studies in this area as well.